Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42439864›Full record

Observational studyCancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center

Surveillance for Pancreatic Cancer: Knowledge, Motivations, Barriers, and Preferences Among High-Risk Individuals and Underserved Populations.

Emily Van Houweling, Sharon McCoy, Brett Sheppard, Alexander R Guimaraes, Rosalie Sears, Jackilen Shannon, Paige E Farris, Christina Mandrup Jäderholm, Gregory A Coté

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Emily Van HouwelingKnight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU), Portland, OR, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6856-4406
Sharon McCoyKnight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU), Portland, OR, USA.
Brett SheppardKnight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU), Portland, OR, USA.
Alexander R GuimaraesKnight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU), Portland, OR, USA.
Rosalie SearsKnight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU), Portland, OR, USA.
Jackilen ShannonKnight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU), Portland, OR, USA.
Paige E FarrisKnight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU), Portland, OR, USA.
Christina Mandrup JäderholmDepartment of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Gregory A CotéKnight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU), Portland, OR, USA.

Funding

Oregon Clinical and Translational Research Institute - The National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C)UL1TR002369 · NCATS · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Cynthia D Morris, Christopher G. Slatore · 2017 to 2026
$78.4M
Validation of novel imaging and molecular tests for early detection of pancreatic cancer through risk-stratified community engagement programsU01CA278923 · NCI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Gregory A Cote, Alexander Savio Ramos Guimaraes · 2023 to 2026
$3.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002369NCI NIH HHS U01 CA278923
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

IntroductionSurveillance of at-risk populations for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a potential strategy to reduce its incidence and improve its prognosis. However, there is considerable debate about who should participate and relatively little information about how people perceive different testing options.MethodsUsing the Health Belief Model as a framework, this qualitative, observational study including eleven focus groups and seven interviews, summarizes the knowledge, motivations, barriers and preferences for PDAC surveillance in underserved populations with low cancer screening rates and for high-risk individuals (HRI).ResultsHRIs have a high motivation to participate in PDAC screening and perceive few barriers to engage. Participants from underserved populations had little knowledge of PDAC and surveillance, but they were interested in surveillance for PDAC based on their perception of the benefits of cancer screenings. The main barriers for participation in PDAC surveillance programs were cost, distrust of the larger medical system, discomfort associated with the testing, lack of a provider's recommendation, and fear of a positive result. These barriers varied based on a person's race/ethnicity and geographic location (urban vs. rural). Preferences expressed by underserved populations suggest that tests for early PDAC detection will need to be accurate, no or low cost, minimally invasive, and convenient to access. There was a correlation between a person's self-perceived susceptibility for PDAC and their willingness to tolerate more invasive and less convenient methods. In addition, participants were motivated to participate in early detection programs with clear guidelines accompanied by their doctor's recommendations.ConclusionThere appears to be an association between actual and perceived risk of PDAC and patient willingness to participate in an early detection program. For populations lower along the risk spectrum, there is limited knowledge about pancreatic cancer or its risk factors, and potentially significant barriers to participate in an early detection program if deemed eligible.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalEarly Detection of CancerHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePancreatic NeoplasmsVulnerable PopulationsAdultAgedFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotivationPatient PreferenceQualitative Researchcancer surveillancehealth belief modelhigh-risk individualspancreatic cancerqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID42439864
PMCPMC13365665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.