Observational studyTherapeutic advances in respiratory disease
Feasibility and preliminary clinical outcomes of medical thoracoscopic bulla volume reduction for giant emphysematous bulla.
Observational study in Therapeutic advances in respiratory disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGiant emphysematous bulla (GEB) is a form of emphysematous lung destruction and patients experience progressive dyspnea and decline in quality of life. Conventional surgical reduction is not available for all patients, especially those in poor condition, and a less invasive approach is needed.
objectivesThis study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and preliminary clinical outcomes of medical thoracoscopic bulla volume reduction for GEB.
designSingle-center retrospective observational study.
methodsA total of 35 GEB patients who underwent medical thoracoscopic bulla volume reduction were retrospectively analyzed. Preoperative and postoperative clinical data and chest computed tomography were collected. The feasibility of the technique was evaluated by radiological changes (bullae volume and diameter) and postoperative complications. Improvement in dyspnea was assessed using the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scale. Accessible six-minute walk distance (6MWD) and spirometry test follow-up data were analyzed to assess preliminary clinical functional improvement.
resultsThe targeted bulla volume was 1183.8 ± 636.7 mL preoperatively and decreased to 169.2 ± 237.2 mL postoperatively, representing an 87.7 ± 17.1% decrease compared to the baseline. A total of 91.4% (32/35) of the patients achieved more than 50% volume reduction relative to baseline, and the diameter of the targeted bulla also showed a significant decrease (
conclusionMedical thoracoscopic bulla volume reduction may represent a feasible and less invasive therapeutic option for patients with GEB and demonstrated preliminary clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.