ReviewCells2026
Albumin-Based Drug Delivery for Glioblastoma Treatment: Mechanistic Rationale, Preclinical Evidence, and Clinical Translation.
Review in Cells, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Glioblastoma remains the most aggressive primary brain malignancy, with poor survival despite maximal safe resection, radiotherapy, and temozolomide-based chemotherapy. A major obstacle to effective treatment is the spatially heterogeneous blood-brain barrier/blood-tumor barrier, which restricts drug penetration into infiltrative tumor regions and limits uniform intratumoral exposure. Albumin-based delivery is attractive in glioblastoma because it addresses several formulation-level barriers at once: poor aqueous solubility of hydrophobic payloads, short systemic exposure, and the need for a biocompatible carrier that can interact with albumin-handling pathways such as gp60/albondin, SPARC, FcRn, and caveolin-associated transport. This review examines albumin-based strategies explored for glioblastoma, with an emphasis on albumin-bound paclitaxel nanoparticles, engineered albumin nanoparticles, dual-payload systems, albumin-binding photosensitizers, macrophage-assisted delivery, and albumin-bound pathway-directed agents. Preclinical evidence suggests that these platforms can improve brain-tumor drug exposure, support rational combinations, and synergize with BBB/BTB-opening technologies. Early clinical studies combining low-intensity pulsed ultrasound with microbubbles and albumin-bound paclitaxel provide human proof of concept for regional pharmacokinetic enhancement in recurrent glioblastoma, although survival benefit remains unproven. The available evidence supports albumin-based delivery as a rational formulation strategy. Its clinical value in GBM will depend on three testable requirements: spatial pharmacokinetic confirmation, biomarker-guided patient selection, and reproducible BBB/BTB modulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.