ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2026
Multi-omics network reconstruction with collaborative graphical lasso.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- MAJA: multivariate Bayesian model for discovery of shared epigenetic pathways across human phenotypes.Bioinformatics advances · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationIn recent years, the availability of multi-omics data has increased substantially. Multi-omics data integration methods mainly aim to leverage different molecular layers to gain a complete molecular description of biological processes. An attractive integration approach is the reconstruction of multi-omics networks. However, the development of effective multi-omics network reconstruction strategies lags behind.
resultsIn this study, we introduce collaborative graphical lasso, a novel approach that extends graphical lasso by incorporating collaboration between omics layers, thereby improving multi-omics data integration and enhancing network inference. Our method leverages a collaborative penalty term, which harmonizes the contribution of the omics layers to the reconstruction of the network structure. This promotes a cohesive integration of information across modalities, and it is introduced alongside a dual regularization scheme that separately controls sparsity within and between layers. To address the challenge of model selection in this framework, we propose XStARS, a stability-based criterion for multi-dimensional hyperparameter tuning. We assess the performance of collaborative graphical lasso and the corresponding model selection procedure through simulations, and we apply them to publicly available multi-omics data. This application demonstrated collaborative graphical lasso recovers established biological interactions while suggesting novel, biologically coherent connections. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: We implemented collaborative graphical lasso as an R package, available on CRAN as coglasso. The results of the manuscript can be reproduced running the code available at https://github.com/DrQuestion/coglasso_reproducible_code, deposited on figshare with DOI: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.32324376.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.