Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42439429›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2026

Effect of Signal-Strength Filtering on 3D Convolutional Neural Network-Based Visual Field Estimation From Macular OCT.

Makoto Koyama, Hidenori Takahashi, Satoru Inoda, Chihiro Mayama, Yuta Ueno, Yoshikazu Ito, Yuta Nariya, Yuji Inoue, Kenji Kashiwagi, Tetsuro Oshika and 1 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Makoto KoyamaMinamikoyasu Eye Clinic, Kimitsu, Japan.
Hidenori TakahashiCenter for Cyber Medicine Research, Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Satoru InodaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Japan.
Chihiro MayamaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Japan Community Health Care Organization Tokyo Shinjuku Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuta UenoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Yoshikazu ItoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Yuta NariyaDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuji InoueDepartment of Ophthalmology, Teikyo University, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Kenji KashiwagiDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Yamanashi Faculty of Medicine, Yamanashi, Japan.
Tetsuro OshikaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Masaki TanitoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Izumo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To determine whether excluding low-signal-strength optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans from training improves deep learning-based visual field (VF) estimation from macular OCT volumes. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 79,803 paired OCT and VF examinations from 8511 patients at five institutions. A three-dimensional convolutional neural network (3DCNN) estimated 24-2 and 10-2 pointwise sensitivities and mean deviation (MD) from NIDEK OCT volumes. Using patient-wise 10-fold cross-validation, we compared training on all scans with filtering at signal strength indices (SSIs) ≥ 7; training sets differed in size and SSI composition, and both models were tested on identical held-out samples stratified by SSI. Outcomes were pointwise mean absolute error (MAE) and absolute MD error. Results: Mean SSI was 8.03 ± 1.65; 85.5% of scans had SSI ≥ 7. In the SSI < 7 subgroup, the all-SSI-trained model yielded lower errors for all endpoints, with reductions of 0.439 dB (24-2 MAE), 0.473 dB (10-2 MAE), 0.417 dB (24-2 MD error), and 0.453 dB (10-2 MD error; all adjusted P < 0.001). In the SSI ≥ 7 subgroup, no significant differences were observed. Error increased as SSI decreased, without a clear threshold at SSI = 7. Conclusions: In this EfficientNet 3D-based segmentation-free 3DCNN framework, using OCT scans across the full SSI range was associated with lower error in low-SSI held-out scans, with no significant penalty in higher SSI held-out scans in the primary comparison within this dataset. Translational Relevance: Including lower-signal-strength NIDEK macular OCT scans in development may improve robustness to lower-SSI inputs in this segmentation-free OCT-based VF framework.

Indexed as

Convolutional Neural NetworksImaging, Three-DimensionalMacula LuteaTomography, Optical CoherenceVisual FieldsFemaleHumansRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID42439429
PMCPMC13374834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.