ArticleEndocrine-related cancer2026
Origin and evolution of colorectal mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNEN).
Article in Endocrine-related cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- What are the Unmet Needs in Managing Digestive Neuroendocrine Carcinomas?Current oncology reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractColorectal neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) is a rare and aggressive cancer and in a subset of patients associated with an adenocarcinoma (AC) component. When both components exceed 30% of the tumour, it is classified as mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasm (MiNEN), although there is an ongoing debate about whether any presence of two distinct components should be sufficient for a MiNEN diagnosis. This study aimed to investigate the origin and subsequent genetic changes of these two components. Ten colorectal cases suitable for sampling of an AC and a poorly differentiated NEC component were identified from the NORDIC NEC 2 study and sequenced across a 360-cancer gene panel. Mock phylogenetic trees were constructed from the molecular profiles of each sample within a patient. All ten cases revealed a common trunk of shared somatic mutations, including well-known colorectal cancer driver mutations such as BRAF, KRAS, APC, and TP53. In all cases, a single branching point separated the AC and NEC components. Private AC and NEC mutations generally had low variant allele frequencies, indicating that most AC and NEC cells were genetically similar. NEC, when compared with AC samples, demonstrated a higher frequency of private mutations (P = 0.009), indicating a higher mutation rate and greater ploidy (P = 0.012), suggesting an association between genomic duplication and AC-to-NEC transition. Shared mutations indicate a common clonal origin, underscoring the role of established colorectal driver mutations in the early development of these tumours, while the mechanisms underlying NEC differentiation remain poorly understood and may involve non-genetic factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.