Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42439372›Full record

ArticleInquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing

Enactivism in Autism Healthcare Practices: A Scoping Review.

Johannes Cornelis van Huizen, Jan-Pieter Teunisse, Rosa H van Doormaal, Antje Orgassa, Wouter G Staal, Derek W Strijbos

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Johannes Cornelis van HuizenSchool of Social Studies, HAN University of Applied Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5548-6894
Jan-Pieter TeunisseSchool of Social Studies, HAN University of Applied Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Rosa H van DoormaalIndependent researcher, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Antje OrgassaSchool of Social Studies, HAN University of Applied Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Wouter G StaalDepartment of Psychiatry, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Derek W StrijbosFaculty of Philosophy, Theology, and Religious Studies, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

IntroductionAutism support needs can be viewed as 'wicked problems', underpinned by various disrupting factors distributed across time and space. This complexity strains care providers' ability to act swiftly and decisively. An integrative autopoietic-enactive approach may offer guidance by taking the individual's interactional social-ecological system as the central unit of analysis. In clinical practice and research, however, this approach is only beginning to take shape. A lack of definition and codification hinders practical guidance and clinical innovation.MethodTo explore what autopoietic-enactive autism healthcare might mean in practice, this scoping review maps healthcare practices that are already based on autopoietic enactivism or bear affinity with it.ResultsForty-nine publications met with inclusion, representing 2.21% of the initial corpus. Findings were synthesized using four analytical lenses: aspects of (I)

Indexed as

Autistic DisorderDelivery of Health CareHumansautism healthcare practices4autopoietic enactivism1complexity5enactivism2integration6self-regulation2sense-making3

Identifiers

PMID42439372
PMCPMC13365672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.