ArticleThe Journal of animal ecology2026
The role of viability selection in shaping short- and long-term consequences of early-life conditions: An experiment in the Alpine swift.
Article in The Journal of animal ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The role of viability selection in shaping short- and long-term consequences of early-life conditions: An experiment in the Alpine swift.The Journal of animal ecology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Environmental conditions experienced early in life can shape growth, morphology and survival, and can have lasting effects on individuals that survive to adulthood. Understanding how early-life conditions affect fitness components across the life cycle is therefore essential for predicting variation in life-history trajectories and their ecological and evolutionary consequences. We experimentally tested for short- and long-term effects of early growth conditions by manipulating brood size in a wild population of the long-lived Alpine swift Tachymarptis melba. Enlarging or reducing brood size alters sibling competition and per capita resource availability, with potential consequences on resource allocation between growth and self-maintenance. We manipulated 45 pairs of broods between 2003 and 2006 and followed the offspring throughout their lives until 2019. Brood enlargement reduced average growth and survival, while increasing phenotypic variability among nestlings. Nestlings from enlarged broods were smaller, fledged later, and had lower survival to fledging and recruitment. Recruitment probability increased with nestling size, indicating strong selection on developmental phenotype. Consequently, nestlings from enlarged broods that recruited were a non-random subset of bigger, higher-quality individuals, and morphological differences between treatments disappeared among adults. Despite lower recruitment, individuals from enlarged broods showed equal or higher lifetime reproductive output, primarily through more frequent breeding attempts. Age-specific analyses showed that reproductive performance patterns reflected both within-individual changes and selective disappearance among individuals. We discuss how early-life conditions shape life-history trajectories through both developmental effects and selection acting before adulthood, arguing that apparent advantages in adult performance among individuals from harsher developmental environments arise from viability selection rather than beneficial effects of early-life stress. Our findings show how missing-fraction problems can bias inferences about fitness when early-life mortality is ignored, highlighting the need to integrate early survival when evaluating the lifelong consequences of developmental environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.