Observational studyThe Korean journal of internal medicine2026
Distal radial access in acute coronary syndrome patients with good arterial pulsation: a subgroup analysis from the KODRA registry.
Observational study in The Korean journal of internal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
aimsDistal radial access (DRA) has been associated with fewer access-site complications, but evidence in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remains limited. This study evaluated the feasibility and safety of DRA in ACS patients with good arterial pulsation.
methodsPatients with good arterial pulsation from the prospective, multicenter KODRA registry were analyzed, comparing those with ACS (n = 1,618) and non-ACS (n = 2,588). The primary efficacy endpoint was successful coronary angiography (CAG) without access-site crossover. The primary safety endpoint was DRA-related bleeding, and the secondary safety endpoint was radial artery occlusion (RAO). Multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess the association between ACS and study endpoints.
resultsThe mean age was 66.3 ± 11.9 years, and 69.6% were male. The rate of successful CAG without access-site crossover was comparable between ACS and non-ACS patients (94.2% vs. 94.9%, p = 0.094). DRA-related bleeding occurred more frequently in ACS (4.3% vs. 2.6%, p = 0.002). RAO rates were similar before discharge (0.1% vs. 0.2%, p = 0.396), but lower at one-month in ACS patients (0.3% vs. 1.0%, p = 0.010). ACS was not independently associated with either primary efficacy (OR 0.871, 95% CI 0.664-1.144) or primary safety endpoint (OR 0.817, 95% CI 0.538-1.240).
conclusionIn patients with good arterial pulsation, DRA was feasible in ACS, with higher bleeding but lower RAO compared with non-ACS. ACS was not independently associated with procedural failure or DRA-related bleeding. DRA may be considered a reasonable access strategy in selected ACS patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.