ArticleOsteoarthritis and cartilage open2026
Physiotherapists experiences with cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) training: Mixed methods study.
Article in Osteoarthritis and cartilage open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Explore physiotherapists' experiences with Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Insomnia (CBT-I) training to understand factors that may influence implementation and upscaling of CBT-I training for physiotherapists. Method: Using a mixed-methods approach, data were collected through questionnaires and semi-structured interviews from twelve physiotherapists (3-27 years' experience) who completed a CBT-I training program consisting of online workshops and a pilot case. The Educational Course Assessment Toolkit (EDUCATOOL) evaluated reaction, learning, expected outcomes and behaviours in relation to the CBT-I training, and the Determinants of Implementation Behaviour Questionnaire (DIBQ), assessed barriers and enablers to the implementation of CBT-I. Interviews explored physiotherapists' experiences of the training, guided by the theoretical framework of acceptability. Data were analysed thematically, with themes subsequently mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework. Results: The median EDUCATOOL overall score was 92.38 (IQR = 87.35-99.00) out of 100.87% of DIBQ items were rated favourably to their respective domains (>4 on 7-point Likert scale). Four themes were generated from the interviews. Physiotherapists reported confidence in their capability to deliver CBT-I, reflecting (1) readiness for implementation in their professional role. (2) Training delivery and design contributed positively to knowledge acquisition. (3) Experiential learning enhanced understanding and confidence. However, physiotherapists noted (4) barriers affecting the integration of CBT-I in physiotherapy practice, including stakeholder engagement, and feasibility considerations related to billing, and delivery. Conclusion: Physiotherapists felt confident to deliver CBT-I following a training program. For successful upscaling, future initiatives must address identified systemic and practical barriers, including stakeholder engagement and delivery feasibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.