Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42438787›Full record

ArticleESMO real world data and digital oncology2026

Subsequent systemic therapy initiation after first-line discontinuation in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: insights from a Japanese real-world cohort.

H Sato, T Narita, Y Sekine, M Shinohara, Y Kawashima, K Mori, K Numakura, H Kodama, J Mikami, N Fujita and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ESMO real world data and digital oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

H SatoDepartment of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.
T NaritaDepartment of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.
Y SekineDepartment of Urology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita, Japan.
M ShinoharaDepartment of Urology, Ageo Central General Hospital, Ageo, Japan.
Y KawashimaDepartment of Urology, Ageo Central General Hospital, Ageo, Japan.
K MoriDepartment of Urology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita, Japan.
K NumakuraDepartment of Renal and Urologic Surgery, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Japan.
H KodamaDepartment of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.
J MikamiDepartment of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.
N FujitaDepartment of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.
T OkamotoDepartment of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.
H YamamotoDepartment of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.
S NaritaDepartment of Urology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita, Japan.
S SatoDepartment of Urology, Ageo Central General Hospital, Ageo, Japan.
T HabuchiDepartment of Urology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita, Japan.
C OhyamaDepartment of Renal and Urologic Surgery, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Japan.
S HatakeyamaDepartment of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Sequential systemic therapy after first-line discontinuation in metastatic renal cell carcinoma remains incompletely characterized in routine practice. We aimed to evaluate subsequent systemic therapy initiation in a Japanese real-world cohort and identify clinical factors associated with failure to initiate subsequent therapy. Patients and methods: The primary analysis used real-world data from the Japanese AGEHA database ( Results: Among patients with PD- or AE-related discontinuation, subsequent systemic therapy was initiated in 66.7% of those receiving first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) monotherapy and 59.9% of those receiving immune-oncology (IO)-based regimens. Failure to initiate subsequent therapy was independently associated with poorer Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status and receipt of IO-based first-line regimens, whereas discontinuation due to PD was associated with a higher likelihood of subsequent therapy initiation. Conclusions: Failure to initiate subsequent therapy after first-line discontinuation was not uncommon in real-world practice, but its interpretation depended on the denominator definition and treatment context. In the immune checkpoint inhibitor era, lower rates of subsequent therapy initiation may not have the same clinical implications as in the TKI monotherapy era and should be interpreted cautiously.

Indexed as

immune-oncologymetastatic renal cell carcinomareal-world datasubsequent therapytreatment sequencing

Identifiers

PMID42438787
PMCPMC13356749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.