Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42438772›Full record

ArticleCurrent developments in nutrition2026

Dietary Intake of Plant-Based Meat Consumers-A Cross-Sectional Analysis Based on the National Diet and Nutrition Survey (Years 2014-2019) in the United Kingdom.

Nicole Neufingerl, Laurine Ballintijn, Sander Biesbroek, Anne J Wanders

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current developments in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nicole NeufingerlNutrition & Health Department, Unilever Foods Innovation Center, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Laurine BallintijnDivision of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Sander BiesbroekDivision of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Anne J WandersNutrition & Health Department, Unilever Foods Innovation Center, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Current knowledge on the quality of dietary intakes from plant-based meat (PBM)-containing diets is mainly based on theoretical modeling studies, whereas empirical evidence from actual consumption data is scarce. Objectives: This study aimed to investigate dietary intakes of PBM consumers compared with nonconsumers using real-life United Kingdom consumption data. Methods: Intakes of adults (18-65 y) from the National Diet and Nutrition Survey Rolling Program (2014-2019) in the United Kingdom were calculated based on a 4-d dietary diary. Nutrient intakes were expressed as percentages of nutrient-specific dietary reference values (DRVs), and Mann-Whitney Results: PBM consumers consumed more fruits, vegetables, and pulses (median [interquartile range]: 346 [234, 484] compared with 228 [121, 365] g/d, Conclusions: PBM consumers had more favorable food and nutrient intakes than nonconsumers, indicating that PBM can be part of a healthier and more plant-based diet.

Indexed as

dietary intakediet transitionmeat alternativesnutrient adequacyplant-based meatUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID42438772
PMCPMC13356719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.