Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42438766›Full record

ArticleOpen respiratory archives

Radical Endobronchial Brachytherapy: A Therapeutic Alternative in Selected Cases.

Eduardo Solís García, Estefanía Llopis Pastor, Elisabet González Del Portillo, José Zapataro Ortuño, Mercedes García-Salmones Martín

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Open respiratory archives. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Eduardo Solís GarcíaInterventional Pulmonology Unit, Pulmonology Department, Hospital Universitario Rey Juan Carlos, Calle Gladiolo, s/n, 28933 Móstoles, Spain.
Estefanía Llopis PastorInterventional Pulmonology Unit, Pulmonology Department, Hospital Universitario Rey Juan Carlos, Calle Gladiolo, s/n, 28933 Móstoles, Spain.
Elisabet González Del PortilloInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria Fundación Jiménez Díaz (IIS-FJD, UAM), Madrid 28040, Spain.
José Zapataro OrtuñoInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria Fundación Jiménez Díaz (IIS-FJD, UAM), Madrid 28040, Spain.
Mercedes García-Salmones MartínInterventional Pulmonology Unit, Pulmonology Department, Hospital Universitario Rey Juan Carlos, Calle Gladiolo, s/n, 28933 Móstoles, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A 75-year-old male, former smoker (50 pack-years), with a history of squamous cell lung carcinoma treated with right lower lobectomy 20 years earlier, presented with progressive dyspnea at rest (mMRC IV) and hypoxemic respiratory failure. Chest computed tomography revealed a 14 mm nodular lesion in the left main bronchus. Bronchoscopy showed a lesion at the carina between the left upper and lower lobes, causing near-complete obstruction. Biopsy and partial endoscopic resection were performed, but follow-up demonstrated slight progression. Histopathology confirmed squamous cell carcinoma. Due to prior lobectomy, surgery was ruled out, and radical high-dose-rate endobronchial brachytherapy with Iridium-192 (30 Gy in six weekly fractions) was administered. Complete endobronchial resolution was achieved and maintained at six months. Endobronchial brachytherapy is a well-tolerated technique that delivers high radiation doses with minimal damage to surrounding tissue and may represent a radical therapeutic option in selected patients with localized endobronchial tumors not eligible for surgery or external radiotherapy.

Indexed as

BrachytherapyBronchoscopyLung cancer

Identifiers

PMID42438766
PMCPMC13356760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.