ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2026
Potential Refractive Error Due to Axial Displacement of Intraocular Lenses with Clinically Relevant Compression Diameters.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the mechanical stability and associated potential refractive error (RE) of 9 different intraocular lens (IOL) models using compression diameters that are aligned with published clinical mean capsular bag diameters (CBD). Setting: Research Laboratory. Design: Prospective, non-randomized, in vitro bench testing using physiological conditions. Methods: Single-piece acrylic IOLs (3-5 per model) were tested for axial displacement, optic decentration, optic tilt, and haptic compression force at both 9-mm and 10-mm compression diameters under simulated physiological conditions. Potential RE was calculated based on the mean axial displacement observed and using a schematic eye model. Results: The three different Clareon optical models had statistically equivalent results, confirming that mechanical stability performance is not affected by the optical design. At 9-mm compression, the measured axial displacement values of the Clareon models were significantly lower than the 6 other models assessed (P < 0.05). At both diameters, the haptic compression force for Clareon was statistically lower than 5 of the other models (P < 0.05). Between the two compression diameters, there were substantial increases in axial displacement and haptic compression force for some of the IOL models. There were no statistical differences among the IOL models studied with respect to either optic decentration or optic tilt. Conclusion: Clareon IOL models had lower levels of axial displacement, compression force and potential RE. Refractive errors may occur with those IOL models that show significant axial displacement with compression, especially in short eyes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.