ArticleAmerican journal of ophthalmology case reports2026
Metallic clip removal 40 years after scleral encircling surgery for retinal detachment: A case report.
Article in American journal of ophthalmology case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To report our findings in a case in which a metallic clip used for scleral encircling surgery was accidentally detected and surgically removed more than 40 years after its use in the initial retinal detachment surgery. Observations: The patient was a 54-year-old woman who had undergone surgical treatment for a rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in both eyes during childhood. Her preoperative decimal best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 0.5 in the right eye and 0.01 in the left eye. Postoperatively, the BCVA improved to 1.0 in the right eye, but remained at 0.01 in the left eye. During follow-up period, the BCVA in the left eye improved to only 0.03. Due to the progression of a cataract, the BCVA in the left eye had been reduced to hand motion for more than 10 years and to light perception for the past 2 years. She sustained a mild head injury in a traffic accident and underwent plain skull radiography. A metallic-like foreign body was detected in the left orbit in the radiographs. The site of the foreign body corresponded to the site of a previous scleral encircling procedure. Although the patient was asymptomatic, the presence of the retained metallic implant raised concerns regarding magnetic resonance imaging safety and resulted in significant patient anxiety. Surgical exploration demonstrated that the metallic clip was partially located beneath the inferior rectus muscle and was encapsulated by fibrotic tissue. The clip, along with the associated silicone band, was successfully removed without intraoperative or postoperative complications. Conclusions and importance: This case underscores the long-term clinical and psychological implications of retained surgical materials from historical surgical procedures. Awareness of legacy implants and accurate documentation of surgical materials are essential to support safe, informed clinical decision-making in long-term postoperative care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.