ArticleJournal of oral biology and craniofacial research
Perceptions of essential oral health care and locus of control among adults in a developing country.
Article in Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Oral diseases are among the most prevalent global health problems, disproportionately affecting disadvantaged populations. Essential Oral Health Care (EOHC), endorsed by the World Health Organization, comprises basic promotive, preventive, and curative services that should be universally accessible. Public perceptions and psychological factors, particularly Locus of Control (LOC), strongly influence oral health behaviors and service use. This study assessed adults' perceptions of Essential Oral Health Care (EOHC) services and examined the association of Locus of Control (LOC) with sociodemographic factors. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 150 adults residing in Trilokpuri, New Delhi. Data were collected through interviewer-administered questionnaires on six domains: perceived needs, essential services, service adequacy, barriers to utilization, self-rated oral health and LOC. Statistical tests, including Mann- Whitney Results: Most participants (68.0%) recognized oral health as part of general health, yet only 34.0% reported a dental visit in the past year. Pain relief (42.0%) was the most commonly perceived essential service. Cost and waiting time were major barriers. Internal LOC was observed in 38.7% of participants and was positively associated with higher socioeconomic status (SES) (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Adults demonstrated limited awareness and narrow perceptions of EOHC, with substantial access and affordability barriers. Internal LOC was significantly associated with higher SES, underscoring the need for community-based oral health education and systemic strengthening of affordable EOHC services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.