ArticleMedical devices (Auckland, N.Z.)2026
Evaluation of a Portable Ultrasound System for Peripheral Intravenous Access: Performance and Safety in a Clinical Setting.
Article in Medical devices (Auckland, N.Z.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ultrasound-guided vascular access has been increasingly used in clinical practice with studies supporting improved insertion success and reduced complications. To meet the needs of various vascular access applications, ultrasound systems have been evolving with specific features. This study evaluated the safety and performance of a recently developed portable ultrasound system with needle tracking technology for peripheral intravenous catheterization. Methods: The prospective observational clinical study was conducted at one US medical center between November 2025 and January 2026. Eligible participants requiring peripheral intravenous access underwent ultrasound-guided insertion for peripheral intravenous catheterization. Primary endpoints included successful visualization of target vasculature and successful intravenous access. Safety was assessed by the incidence of device-related adverse events. Descriptive statistics and exact binomial confidence intervals were calculated. Results: A total of 149 subjects were enrolled, including 17 pediatric (1-17 years) and 132 adult (≥18 years) patients. Ninety-six of these patients presented with at least one DIVA risk factor, including no visible veins, no palpable veins, a history of difficult IV access, IV drug use, or a BMI ≥ 30 kg/m Conclusion: The portable ultrasound system was associated with high first-attempt insertion success and high vascular visualization for peripheral intravenous access with no adverse events. The portable ultrasound system can be successfully used for bedside vascular access in a real-world environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.