ReviewCureus2026
Early Recognition and Management of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Following Distal Radius Fracture: A Structured Narrative Review.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a chronic pain disorder that may develop following a distal radius fracture and can result in significant functional impairment and prolonged disability. Early diagnosis remains challenging because symptoms frequently overlap with normal post-fracture recovery. This structured narrative review evaluated current evidence regarding the timing of diagnosis, early predictors, and early management strategies influencing outcomes of CRPS following distal radius fracture. A structured literature search of PubMed/MEDLINE and Embase was performed for English-language studies published between 2000 and 2026 using combinations of keywords related to CRPS, distal radius fracture, diagnosis, risk factors, prevention, and management. Studies involving adult patients with CRPS following distal radius or wrist fracture and addressing diagnosis, predictors, or early management strategies were included. Owing to heterogeneity in study designs and outcome measures, findings were synthesized using thematic narrative analysis. Twenty-six studies met the inclusion criteria. Evidence suggests that clinical and physiological abnormalities associated with CRPS may emerge during the early post-injury period, although formal diagnosis is often established weeks to months after fracture treatment. Higher early pain intensity, enhanced pain sensitization, fibromyalgia, female sex, older age, lower vitamin D levels, and certain genetic polymorphisms were associated with an increased risk of CRPS. Early mobilization and structured rehabilitation strategies were associated with improved functional outcomes and lower reported CRPS incidence in several studies. Evidence regarding vitamin C prophylaxis was heterogeneous, with meta-analyses suggesting potential benefit while individual randomized controlled trials reported inconsistent findings. Imaging modalities demonstrated limited sensitivity for early diagnosis, reinforcing the importance of longitudinal clinical assessment. CRPS remains an uncommon but clinically important complication following a distal radius fracture. Current evidence supports the concept that altered recovery trajectories and early pain amplification may precede formal diagnosis. Careful monitoring of recovery, recognition of disproportionate symptoms, and promotion of early functional rehabilitation may facilitate earlier identification and management. Further prospective studies using standardized diagnostic criteria are required to better define early predictors and optimize preventive strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.