ArticleCureus2026
Telemedicine Practice, Perceived Barriers, and Concerns Among Doctors in Kerala.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Telemedicine bridges gaps in accessibility and improves patient care. Its adoption has been progressively rising in India; however, there are considerable barriers to overcome. This study aimed to assess the utilization of telemedicine by doctors in Kerala and identify the perceived barriers and concerns faced by practicing doctors. This cross-sectional study involved 535 doctors currently practicing modern medicine in Kerala. Practitioners of AYUSH systems (Ayurveda, Yoga and Naturopathy, Unani, Siddha, and Homeopathy) were excluded. A semi-structured questionnaire was used to collect data from June 2020 to May 2021. Participants were recruited using a nonrandom referral chain sampling method. Data analysis was carried out using IBM SPSS version 20.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Chi-square tests were used as tests of significance. Among the participants, 337 (62.9%) doctors used telemedicine in their practice. Male gender (AOR=1.533; 95% CI: 1.028-2.288), availability of facilities for telemedicine practice in the hospital (AOR=3.032; 95% CI: 1.945-4.727), and attendance at a webinar or seminar (AOR=2.327; 95% CI: 1.52-3.542) were found to be associated with telemedicine use among doctors. The main barriers perceived by the doctors included the lack of direct physical contact with patients, 49 (9.2%); underuse of their clinical skills during telemedicine, 36 (6.7%); and lack of clarity regarding telemedicine regulations, 28 (5.2%). Nearly two-thirds of the surveyed physicians reported using telemedicine in their clinical practice. Telemedicine practice was independently associated with male gender, availability of telemedicine facilities within the hospital, and participation in telemedicine-related educational activities. Despite its widespread adoption, physicians reported several barriers, including the inability to perform direct physical examinations, perceived underutilization of clinical skills, and lack of clarity regarding telemedicine regulations. Strengthening institutional telemedicine infrastructure, enhancing training opportunities, and improving awareness of regulatory guidelines may help address these challenges and support the sustainable integration of telemedicine into routine healthcare delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.