ArticleDigital health
AutoML-driven ensemble learning for intradialytic hypotension prediction.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Intradialytic hypotension (IDH) is a common and serious complication during hemodialysis (HD), associated with increased morbidity and mortality. This study aims to develop an artificial intelligence (AI)-driven early warning system to predict IDH events and recommend real-time dialysis parameter adjustments to enhance patient safety. Materials and Methods: A total of 9,634 HD sessions from 178 patients were collected. Advanced feature engineering techniques were applied, including domain-specific variable generation, Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE), and Recursive Feature Elimination with Cross-Validation (RFECV). An AutoML pipeline tested 100 hyperparameter combinations per run to tailor hospital-specific models. This approach enables rapid development of customized models optimized for institutional variability. Results: Among the evaluated models, CatBoost and LightGBM with Extra Trees achieved the highest performance. CatBoost yielded the best results with a ROC-AUC of 0.934 and an F1-macro score of 0.508. Feature selection and SMOTEEEN resampling further enhanced performance, improving the ROC-AUC to 0.949. Conclusion: The implementation of AutoML for large-scale hyperparameter optimization enables the efficient development of hospital-specific AI models with minimal manual input. This approach supports scalable customization across diverse clinical settings. Our findings underscore the value of AI-powered prediction systems in facilitating early identification and management of intradialytic hypotension (IDH), thereby contributing to improved patient safety and hemodialysis outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.