ArticleGlobal health research and policy2026
Building sustainable primary healthcare systems: Lessons from Brazil and China.
Article in Global health research and policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Primary health care (PHC) is fundamental to achieving universal health coverage and health equity, yet building sustainable PHC systems remains a global challenge. This commentary compares the contrasting yet complementary experiences of Brazil and China along four analytical dimensions: community embeddedness, financial protection and sustainability, continuity of care and coordination across levels, digital support and its dual equity effect. Brazil's Family Health Strategy (FHS), rooted in community-based multidisciplinary teams and a rights-based framework, has significantly reduced mortality from preventable conditions and expanded access for marginalized populations, but faces sustainability threats from underfunding and political instability. China, by contrast, has adopted a state-driven, technologically enabled approach, leveraging telemedicine, electronic records, and AI-enabled tools to scale up PHC. Despite impressive coverage and financial protection, China struggles with limited public trust in frontline providers, fragmented care continuity, and a notable dual pattern in digital health: telemedicine has helped narrow the rural-urban gap, while the gap between younger and older users has widened. Drawing on recent policy documents and empirical studies, we distinguish broadly transferable principles from resource-intensive pathways, offering low- and middle-income country (LMIC) policymakers an integrative framework that prioritizes human-centered relational care reinforced by context-appropriate digital tools, predictable financing, and strong referral linkages within an equity-focused PHC foundation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.