Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42438585›Full record

ArticleBJA open2026

Rethinking remimazolam: reconciling regulatory positioning with clinical reality.

Theodora Wingert, J Robert Sneyd

Abstract readEditorialComment
In one paragraph

Article in BJA open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Theodora WingertDepartment of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
J Robert SneydFaculty of Health: Medicine, Dentistry and Human Sciences, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Goyal and colleagues share a large United States health system's experience of 9431 cases of real-world remimazolam use, offering insight into current practice patterns, recovery times, and accurate adverse event rates. The authors report rapid recovery after remimazolam, including shorter time to post-anaesthesia care unit discharge readiness and faster return to baseline on the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale following flumazenil administration, with a critical event rate of 0.7%. Interesting practice patterns were observed, including frequent co-administration with other anaesthetics rather than as a sole agent. Although only licensed for procedural sedation in the United States, the authors reported extensive use of remimazolam to induce anaesthesia, especially for patients with an American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status of 3-5. This editorial highlights the disconnect between the development of remimazolam and its practical clinical use, as well as the work still needed to clarify the agent's optimal role.

Indexed as

benzodiazepinesdrug hypersensitivitygeneral anaesthesiapharmacovigilanceprocedural sedationremimazolam

Identifiers

PMID42438585
PMCPMC13356673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.