Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42438584›Full record

ArticleProceedings of machine learning research2025

KEEP: Integrating Medical Ontologies with Clinical Data for Robust Code Embeddings.

Ahmed Elhussein, Paul Meddeb, Abigail Newbury, Jeanne Mirone, Martin Stoll, Gamze Gürsoy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of machine learning research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ahmed ElhusseinColumbia University, USA.
Paul MeddebNew York Genome Center, USA.
Abigail NewburyColumbia University, USA.
Jeanne MironeNew York Genome Center, USA.
Martin StollNew York Genome Center, USA.
Gamze GürsoyColumbia University, USA.

Funding

Federated learning algorithms to overcome statistical and algorithmic bias and privacy concerns in machine learning for healthR01LM014380 · NLM · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI NOEMIE ELHADAD · 2024 to 2026
$1.1M
NLM NIH HHS R01 LM014380
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Machine learning in healthcare requires effective representation of structured medical codes, but current methods face a trade-off: knowledge graph-based approaches capture formal relationships but miss real-world patterns, while data-driven methods learn empirical associations but often overlook structured knowledge in medical terminologies. We present KEEP (Knowledge-preserving and Empirically refined Embedding Process), an efficient framework that bridges this gap by combining knowledge graph embeddings with adaptive learning from clinical data. KEEP first generates embeddings from knowledge graphs, then employs regularized training on patient records to adaptively integrate empirical patterns while preserving ontological relationships. Importantly, KEEP produces final embeddings without task-specific axillary or end-to-end training enabling KEEP to support multiple downstream applications and model architectures. Evaluations on structured EHR from UK Biobank and MIMIC-IV demonstrate that KEEP outperforms both traditional and Language Model-based approaches in capturing semantic relationships and predicting clinical outcomes. Moreover, KEEP's minimal computational requirements make it particularly suitable for resource-constrained environments.

Identifiers

PMID42438584
PMCPMC13356279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.