Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42438561›Full record

ArticleMedical science educator2026

Aligning Roles and Responsibilities: Perspectives of Medical Students and Supervisors in Undergraduate Research.

Melissa Shiff, Erik Montagna, Colm O'Tuathaigh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science educator, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Melissa ShiffSchool of Medicine, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Erik MontagnaFaculdade de Medicina do ABC, Centro Universitário FMABC, Santo André, SP Brazil.
Colm O'TuathaighMedical Education Unit, School of Medicine, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-1365-1606

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Active participation of medical students in research activities enables their understanding of research methods and the benefits that research can provide them as both researchers and clinicians. Differing expectations on the part of the student and supervisor regarding their relative roles and expected contribution can influence the achievement of learning outcomes and quality of the research project. Here we explore the expectations of medical students and supervisors regarding the roles and responsibilities of both parties during the completion of an undergraduate medical research project. Employing a mixed methods design, the CREDIT URE tool, which defines, and measures roles performed by undergraduate students working in research placements, was completed by 226 medical students and their project supervisors. Q-methodology was then used to examine perspectives of students and supervisors on their relative responsibilities. Q-set data were analysed using a by-person factor analysis to group participants with shared viewpoints. Using the CREDIT URE tool, students and their project supervisors rated writing of the original draft article, visualisation, data curation, formal analysis, and investigation as the most common roles and those with the highest level of student responsibility. In the Q methodology study, a five-factor solution (i.e. profiles) provided the best fit for the data collected from 25 participants (16 student, 9 supervisors), explaining 55% of the variance. Each profile describes a shared viewpoint on project roles. We characterized the profiles as 'student-driven', 'supervisor as guide and overseer', 'self-motivated student', 'supervisor involved only as needed - skills development' and 'supervisor as editor'. Medical schools increasingly emphasise research competencies as part of undergraduate education. These data are expected to lead to the development of clear supervision frameworks and role descriptions, and by extension may inform the design of undergraduate medical research modules or project guidelines. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-026-02656-0.

Indexed as

Medical studentsQ-methodologyResearch-based learningSupervision

Identifiers

PMID42438561
PMCPMC13356107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.