ArticleMedical science educator2026
A Student-Centered Approach Towards Implementing Large Language Models (LLMs) in Medical Education.
Article in Medical science educator, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Artificial intelligence (AI) generative text tools built on large language models (LLMs) are used by medical students, often without formal training. Research on students' use of LLMs is limited. This study examined students' self-reported experiences with LLMs and their expectations for the integration of LLMs in medical education. Materials and methods: A 30-item cross-sectional email-based survey was distributed at two US medical schools. Survey results were analyzed using descriptive statistics, with non-parametric tests, and ordinal logistic regression was used to assess patterns of LLM engagement. Respondents were stratified into low, moderate, and high-LLM usage groups using k-means clustering, and heatmaps of user frequency were generated. Results: A total of 103 students, spanning all levels of training within medical school, completed the survey. High- versus low-usage users reported greater LLM knowledge (3.46±0.82 vs 2.40±0.91, Discussion: Medical students' perceptions and confidence in LLMs are associated with usage. While students see potential in reducing administrative burden, they also express concern about impacts on learning. Respondents highlighted topics that should be included in formal LLM education. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-026-02675-x.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.