Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42438536›Full record

ArticleMedical science educator2026

Which Factors Promote Interprofessional Competence in Placements on a Training Ward? New Findings.

Michael Hirth, Jutta Hinrichs, Stephanie Schaefer, Mira Mette

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science educator, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michael HirthDepartment of Medicine II, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany.ORCID 0009-0005-2185-2776
Jutta HinrichsSchool of Physiotherapy, Academy of University Medical Centre Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.
Stephanie SchaeferCoordination of practical training for nurses, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.
Mira MetteDivision for Study and Teaching Development, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Interprofessional training wards (ITWs) are established educational formats to foster interprofessional (IP) competence in health professions education. While previous research has demonstrated their overall effectiveness, little is known about which specific factors within ITW placements drive final levels and gains of IP competence and whether these mechanisms differ across professions. Methods: In an explorative study, 151 participants (105 medical students, 23 trainee nurses, 23 trainee physiotherapists) completed their placement on the ITW. Their self-reported data were used for hierarchical multiple regression analyses to identify predictive factors of perceived final levels and gains of IP competence at the end of the placement. Results: For medical students and trainee nurses, the perceived quality of IP interaction during the placement was the strongest predictor of both final level and gain of IP competence ( Conclusion: This study advances IP education research by shifting the focus from the effectiveness of ITWs to the mechanisms underlying IP competence development. High-quality IP collaboration emerges as a key driver of perceived IP competence development. The findings highlight the importance of intentionally designing and facilitating IP interaction and suggest that learning mechanisms may differ across professions.

Indexed as

Interprofessional competenceInterprofessional educationInterprofessional training wardMedical education

Identifiers

PMID42438536
PMCPMC13356116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.