ArticleMedical science educator2026
Understanding the Experiences of Designated Assessors: an Interpretive Phenomenological Study.
Article in Medical science educator, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The expanded use of Entrustable Professional Activities in medical education has led to a call to address concerns about implementation challenges and the validity of this framework for assessment. The use of well-trained, designated assessors (DAs) who not only provide feedback to learners but also participate in summative decision-making about learners' competency is one approach to address these issues. The lived experience of faculty who serve in this role within a program of assessment, including their beliefs and practices, has not been described in the literature. This study examines the experiences of designated assessors at a single institution, concentrating on their dual roles as formative assessors and summative decision-makers. Methods: The experiences of designated assessors were explored using an interpretivist phenomenological approach. All DAs at one institution were invited to participate in the study. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. The interview guide was designed to investigate various aspects of the DA experience. An iterative process of content analysis, careful consideration of participants' statements, and memoing ultimately yielded three themes. Results: Six of eight eligible participants were interviewed. Three themes were developed from in-depth interpretation, which inform the designated assessor's experience. These interpretations center on role enactment, community meaning-making, and the identification of struggling learners. Discussion: Designated Assessors provided rich descriptions of their processes, shared experiences, and meaning they derive from these experiences. The DAs experience the unique assessor community they are building, the consequential nature of the assessments, and the high-quality assessment data they provide as valuable to learners and those who support them.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.