ArticleMedical science educator2026
Feasibility and Acceptability of A Self-Directed Virtual Interview Preparation Tool for Medical Students.
Article in Medical science educator, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The conversion to virtual interviews holds many benefits. However, lack of familiarity with the format may put residency applicants at a disadvantage. Objective: To describe our experience after implementing a web-based system that allow students to rehearse virtual interviews and receive feedback. Methods: Access to a virtual interview practice platform (VIPP) was provided to all students in the Indiana University School of Medicine Class of 2023. Use of the program was encouraged but not mandatory. The most utilized questions and most missed questions were reported. A cross-sectional survey was conducted via Qualtrics to assess student satisfaction. Descriptive statistics were performed using SPSS 29.0 and Chat GPT was used for thematic analysis. Results: During the 2022-2023 year, 214 out of 365 students (58.6%) utilized the VIPP, and 29 students completed the follow up survey. The most difficult questions were: "tell me about a failure", "tell me about a mistake you made and what you learned" and "discuss a challenging patient." Thematic analysis of survey responses identified three main themes: positive impact on interview preparation, mixed feedback on effectiveness and customization needs, and suggestions for improvement. Of those surveyed, 97% (N = 28) would recommend VIPP to students and the majority (N = 27, 93%) agreed that the resource prepared them for virtual interviews. Conclusions: Students who used the VIPP felt the program prepared them well for virtual residency interviews. Given the importance of the interview in the residency application process, integration of this resource could assist students obtaining valuable interview practices. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-025-02627-x.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.