ArticleMedical science educator2026
Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Dundee Polyprofessionalism Inventory I: Academic Integrity among Brazilian Medical Students.
Article in Medical science educator, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The Dundee Polyprofessionalism Inventory I: Academic Integrity is a formative, non-scaling, descriptive test used to promote self-assessment, reflection and to evaluate students' perception on academic misconduct. We report the framework and multistage methodological process of cross-cultural adaptation to Brazilian Portuguese and present validity evidence linking the instrument to educational use. Method: Following an 11-stage adaptation and validation process, we gathered: (i) content evidence via a 13-member expert panel using Lawshe's Content Validity Ratio (CVR); (ii) qualitative response-process evidence via cognitive debriefing with 65 students; and (iii) reliability estimates from an online administration to 582 medical students (years 1-6) from public and private schools nationwide. Internal consistency was estimated with Cronbach's α, and McDonald's ω. Results: After iterative revision, all items met the critical CVR for 13 judges (≥ 0.538, Conclusion: The Brazilian version of Dundee Polyprofessionalism Inventory I: Academic Integrity shows strong content and response-process evidence and high reliability estimates, supporting its use. Its formative, scenario‑based design provides a culturally attuned tool for teaching and longitudinally tracking perceptions, prompting reflection and guiding educational decisions. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-026-02710-x.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.