ArticleBiological psychiatry global open science2026
Does Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Over the Primary Motor Cortex Really Enhance Motor Sequence Learning?
Article in Biological psychiatry global open science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has traditionally been assumed to modulate the brain by directly polarizing cortical neurons. However, recent work has suggested that the resulting electric field reaching the cortex is weak, whereas the field in the scalp is strong enough to stimulate peripheral nerves, potentially influencing cortical excitability indirectly. In this study, we aimed to replicate earlier findings that anodal tDCS enhances motor sequence learning (MSL) and to investigate whether the effects are primarily driven by cortical polarization, peripheral nerve stimulation, or a combination of both. Methods: In a double-blind, preregistered study including 99 adults, we examined the effect of 1 mA anodal tDCS over the primary motor cortex (M1) on MSL using a 3-session serial reaction time task (SRTT). Alongside sham, we added an additional control condition to block peripheral nerve input using BL10 gel thereby isolating peripheral from cortical contributions to tDCS effects. Results: We observed significant within- and across-session improvements in MSL in all conditions ( Conclusions: Given the lack of a significant effect of tDCS on MSL, we could not address our main research question regarding the underlying neurophysiological mechanisms. Nonetheless, our findings contribute to the evidence that tDCS motor effects are unlikely to be as large as previously suggested and add to the body of literature that questions the reliability of tDCS as a neuromodulation technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.