ReviewJournal of orthopaedic translation2026
Electrical stimulation as an emerging strategy in bone repair: Mechanisms, applications, and advances.
Review in Journal of orthopaedic translation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Oxidized-Lipid Signaling and Ferroptosis as Downstream Mechanisms of Titanium-Associated Peri-Implant Bone Loss.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Emerging mechanisms and translational advances in musculoskeletal diseases.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The treatment of critical-sized bone defects remains a substantial clinical challenge in orthopaedics. Electrical stimulation (ES), which mimics the endogenous bioelectric and piezoelectric properties of bone tissue, has emerged as a promising non-invasive modality to facilitate bone regeneration. This review elucidates the multifaceted mechanisms through which ES coordinately enhances osteogenesis, angiogenesis, and inflammation resolution, primarily via the regulation of key signalling pathways and modulation of the immune microenvironment at molecular and cellular levels. We also highlight recent advances in the integration of ES with electroactive biomaterials, enabling more targeted and efficacious therapeutic outcomes. Robust clinical evidence supports the ability of ES to significantly accelerate fracture healing, underscoring its translational relevance and potential for broad clinical adoption. By synthesizing these developments, this review aims to inform and inspire the design of next-generation bone regeneration strategies. The translational potential of this article: ES offers a non-invasive or minimally invasive therapeutic modality that can significantly accelerate fracture healing and bone regeneration. This review synthesizes current mechanistic understanding and clinical evidence, highlighting ES as a potential alternative to secondary revision surgery for nonunion fractures. By integrating ES with electroactive biomaterials and emerging self-powered implantable devices, future strategies can be translated into personalized, intelligent bone repair systems, reducing patient morbidity and healthcare costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.