Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42438415›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2026

Age, Multidomain Lifestyle Intervention, and White Matter Integrity: Secondary Analysis of the POINTER Randomized Clinical Trial.

Pauline Maillard, Prashanthi Vemuri, Danielle J Harvey, Theresa M Harrison, Ashritha L Reddy, Hwamee Oh, Stephen Salloway, Simin Mahinrad, Thomas M Holland, Rachel Whitmer and 4 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03688126 (U.S. Study to Protect Brain Health Through Lifestyle Intervention to Reduce Risk), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03688126 nacompletednot on this map

U.S. Study to Protect Brain Health Through Lifestyle Intervention to Reduce Risk

TypeinterventionalSponsorWake Forest University Health SciencesRan2019 to 2025Enrolled2,000ConditionsAlzheimer DiseaseArmsSelf-Guided Lifestyle Intervention, Structured Lifestyle Intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Pauline MaillardDepartment of Neurology, University of California, Davis.
Prashanthi VemuriDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Danielle J HarveyDepartment of Neurology, University of California, Davis.
Theresa M HarrisonHelen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley.
Ashritha L ReddyDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Hwamee OhDepartment of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
Stephen SallowayMemory and Aging Program, Butler Hospital and Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
Simin MahinradAlzheimer's Association, Chicago, Illinois.
Thomas M HollandWarren Alpert Medical School, Rush University, Chicago, Illinois.
Rachel WhitmerDepartment of Neurology, University of California, Davis.
Mark A EspelandDepartment of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Laura D BakerDepartment of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Susan M LandauHelen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley.
Charles DeCarliDepartment of Neurology, University of California, Davis.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Multidomain lifestyle interventions slow cognitive decline in at-risk older adults, but effects on cerebrovascular injury and whether any effect differs by age or across magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) markers remain unclear. Objectives: To test whether a structured multidomain lifestyle intervention, vs a self-guided program, alters trajectories of cerebrovascular MRI markers and whether baseline diffusion MRI estimates subsequent vascular injury. Design, Setting, and Participants: POINTER Imaging was a prespecified secondary imaging analysis of the US POINTER (US Study to Protect Brain Health Through Lifestyle Intervention to Reduce Risk) randomized clinical trial conducted at multiple US sites. Starting August 1, 2020, and continuing until March 1, 2023, all newly enrolled US POINTER trial participants who met criteria, including being 60 to 79 years of age and at increased risk for cognitive decline, were given the opportunity to enroll in POINTER Imaging. Annual MRIs were performed at baseline and up to 2 follow-up visits at 12 and 24 months. The imaging study ended May 14, 2025. Interventions: Structured multidomain lifestyle arm (supervised exercise, dietary counseling, cognitive and social engagement, and health coaching) vs self-guided educational arm. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes were cerebrovascular MRI markers of global white matter free water (FW), fractional anisotropy (FA), peak width of skeletonized mean diffusivity (PSMD), analysis along the perivascular space (ALPS) index, white matter hyperintensity (WMH) volume, and incident cerebral microbleeds (CMBs). Age-group analyses (<70 vs ≥70 years) were prespecified. Linear mixed-effects models tested time, intervention arm, age group, and interactions for continuous outcomes; logistic regression evaluated incident CMBs. All analyses were adjusted for sex, hypertension, diabetes, and smoking and were conducted for the evaluable population. Data were analyzed September 5 to December 11, 2025. Results: For 959 participants included in the analysis, the mean (SD) age was 68 (5) years, and 594 (61.9%) were female. A significant time × arm × age group interaction was observed for FW (β = 0.050; SE = 0.018; P = .006). In participants younger than 70 years, the structured intervention, compared with the self-guided intervention, attenuated the FW increase over time (β = -0.031; SE = 0.012; P = .009); no intervention arm difference was observed in participants aged 70 years or older (β = 0.019; SE = 0.014; P = .18). No intervention-related interactions were detected (eg, time × intervention arm interaction) for WMH (β = 0.002; SE = 0.016; P = .90), FA (β = 0.016; SE = 0.016; P = .30), PSMD (β = -0.011; SE = 0.021; P = .60), or ALPS (β = 0.006; SE = 0.021; P = .79). Overall, greater odds of incident CMBs were associated with higher baseline FW (odds ratio, 1.63 [95% CI, 1.24-2.14]; P < .001) and PSMD (odds ratio, 1.40 [95% CI, 1.08-1.81]; P < .001). Greater WMH progression was associated with higher baseline FW (β = 0.014; SE = 0.006; P = .02) and lower baseline FA (β = -0.018; SE = 0.006; P = .004). Conclusions and Relevance: In this secondary imaging analysis of a randomized clinical trial, FW was the cerebrovascular MRI marker most responsive to lifestyle intervention in adults 60 to 70 years of age, showing attenuated small-vessel disease-related injury. Findings suggested greater microvascular benefit when intensive lifestyle intervention is implemented earlier in late life. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03688126.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionLife StyleRisk Reduction BehaviorWhite MatterAgedAge FactorsFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID42438415
PMCPMC13366196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.