Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42438321›Full record

SynthesisJournal of veterinary emergency and critical care (San Antonio, Tex. : 2001)

Septic Shock and Prognosis in Dogs and Cats With Sepsis-Consensus Definition and Clinical Criteria.

Robert Goggs, Stefano Cortellini, Amy E DeClue, Massimo Giunti, Kate Hopper, Julie M Menard, Rodrigo C Rabelo, Elizabeth A Rozanski, Claire R Sharp, Deborah C Silverstein and 4 more

Abstract readConsensus StatementSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care (San Antonio, Tex. : 2001). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Sepsis in Dogs and Cats-Consensus Definition and Clinical Criteria.Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care (San Antonio, Tex. : 2001)
    Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Robert GoggsDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Cornell University College of Veterinary Medicine, Ithaca, New York, USA.
Stefano CortelliniDepartment of Clinical Science and Services, The Royal Veterinary College, University of London, Hatfield, UK.
Amy E DeClueFetch Specialty and Emergency Veterinary Center, Greenville, South Carolina, USA.
Massimo GiuntiDepartment of Veterinary Medical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Kate HopperWeill School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA.
Julie M MenardDepartment of Veterinary Clinical and Diagnostic Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Rodrigo C RabeloIntensivet Veterinary Consulting, Brasília, Brazil.
Elizabeth A RozanskiCummings School of Veterinary Medicine, Tufts University, North Grafton, Massachusetts, USA.
Claire R SharpSchool of Veterinary Medicine, Murdoch University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Deborah C SilversteinDepartment of Clinical Studies and Advanced Medicine, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Virginia Sinnott-StutzmanHouse Officer Programs, BluePearl, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Giacomo StanzaniDWR Veterinary Specialists, Newmarket, UK.
John BourgeoisCummings School of Veterinary Medicine, Tufts University, North Grafton, Massachusetts, USA.
Erik FausakUniversity Library, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA.

Funding

American College of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Death from sepsis results from progressive organ dysfunction. Early recognition of increased illness severity or deterioration in clinical status enables timely interventions that can improve outcomes. We aimed to define septic shock by consensus and to use the existing literature to identify associated clinical and clinicopathologic abnormalities that would aid rapid identification of the most severely affected patients. We systematically reviewed the available data on sepsis in dogs and cats to identify factors that were predictive of multiple organ dysfunction or mortality. Septic shock was defined as a subset of sepsis with increased mortality, associated with cardiovascular instability and metabolic abnormalities indicative of impaired tissue perfusion despite adequate fluid resuscitation. Clinically, septic shock can manifest as hyperlactatemia, persistent hypotension, and progressive organ dysfunction. For the assessment of prognosis in dogs, we suggest scoring organ dysfunction and illness severity using validated instruments, and measuring objective physiologic parameters, lactate, and ionized calcium, and performing CBCs and serum biochemistry profiles. Where available, serial measurements of protein C and antithrombin activity, and quantitation of acute phase proteins and cytokine concentrations, should be considered. Fewer data were available for cats, and although many similar conclusions were reached as for dogs, only limited recommendations could be made.

Indexed as

Cat DiseasesDog DiseasesSepsisShock, SepticAnimalsCatsDogsPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID42438321
PMCPMC13490288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.