ArticleBritish journal of haematology2026
The development of novel chimeric antigen receptor gamma-delta T cells against multiple myeloma and single-cell RNA sequencing analysis.
Article in British journal of haematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The development of novel chimeric antigen receptor gamma-delta T cells against multiple myeloma and single-cell RNA sequencing analysis.British journal of haematology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) gamma-delta (γδ) T cells offer a major histocompatibility complex-independent, off-the-shelf alternative to conventional CAR alpha-beta (αβ) Tcells, but their efficacy in multiple myeloma (MM) remains underexplored. In this work, we developed a series of novel CAR γδ T cells redirected to B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) and performed functional assays compared to CAR αβ T cells. As a result, novel CAR γδ T cells demonstrated similar activation upon antigen stimulation compared with CAR αβ T cells but showed lower proliferative capacity and less durable cytotoxicity. In vivo, higher doses of CAR γδ T cells were required to achieve tumour control comparable to CAR αβ T cells. Among CAR constructs, those with cluster of differentiation 3 (CD3ε or CD3ζ) intracellular domain exhibited superior cytotoxicity and in vivo efficacy. Single-cell transcriptomic profiling revealed the low ratio of cycling CAR γδ T cells after antigen stimulation limited the persistence of CAR γδ T cells. In conclusion, our developed novel CAR γδ T cells effectively eliminated MM cells in vitro, but exhibited limited in vivo persistence compared to traditional CAR αβT cells. These findings establish a baseline for utilizing γδ T cells as an off-the-shelf platform and highlight that addressing the proliferation bottleneck through further engineering is essential for future clinical translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.