Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42438304›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical nursing2026

Challenges and Strategies in Interviewing People With Acquired Brain Injury and Communication Impairment in Qualitative Interview Studies: A Secondary Analysis of Interview Data.

Henrietta Gustavsson, Eva Jangland, Lena Nyholm

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Henrietta GustavssonDepartment of Medical Sciences, Neurosurgery, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-9732-1161
Eva JanglandDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Nursing Research, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6888-3792
Lena NyholmDepartment of Medical Sciences, Neurosurgery, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0085-7963

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo explore challenges involved in designing and conducting qualitative interviews with people with communication impairment due to acquired brain injury, as well as analysing data from such interviews, and to map strategies used to facilitate participation.

designSecondary analysis of qualitative interview data.

methodsA secondary qualitative content analysis was conducted using data from a previous multiple-case interview study on daily life without cranial bone protection. Data comprised interviews with patients with acute severe brain injury, family members and staff, as well as logbook notes and field notes incorporated into transcripts.

resultsFindings are presented as a timeline and thematic categories, highlighting challenges related to planning, interviewing people with communication impairment, and interpreting fragmented or partly non-verbal narratives. Strategies included flexible interview procedures, the use of logbooks for planning and analysis, and field notes to capture non-verbal cues. Involvement of family members facilitated participation and interpretation.

conclusionDespite challenges throughout planning, interviewing, and analysis, individuals with communication impairment due to acquired brain injury contributed valuable insights. Involving persons close to the patient enriched and confirmed patient narratives, while direct questioning and documentation of non-verbal communication added depth and breadth that could not be gathered from other sources. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE: The findings provide practical guidance for researchers and clinicians seeking to include people with communication impairment in qualitative research. IMPACT: What problem did the study address? ○ People with communication impairment after acquired brain injury are often excluded from qualitative interview research. What were the main findings? ○ Meaningful participation was facilitated through flexible interviewing, communication support, field notes, and involvement of family members. Where and on whom will the research have an impact? ○ The findings may support researchers and clinicians working with people with communication impairment following acquired brain injury. REPORTING

methodCOREQ. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No Patient or Public Contribution.

Indexed as

Brain InjuriesCommunicationCommunication DisordersInterviews as TopicAdultFamilyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID42438304
PMCPMC13629267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.