Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42438275›Full record

ArticleJournal of morphology2026

Morphological and Cranial Variation and Reproductive Data of Invasive Rodents in Southeastern Mexico.

Gloria Tapia-Ramírez, Consuelo Lorenzo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of morphology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gloria Tapia-RamírezEl Colegio de La Frontera Sur,, San Cristóbal de Las Casas, Chiapas, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8991-9640
Consuelo LorenzoEl Colegio de La Frontera Sur,, San Cristóbal de Las Casas, Chiapas, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7631-4116

Funding

CONAHCYT I1200/311/2023Idea Wild TAPIMEXI0920Rufford Foundation 34742-1SEP-CONACYT 251053
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study reports the first comprehensive analysis of body variation and cranial morphology (using traditional morphometrics) in Rattus norvegicus and R. rattus in San Cristobal de Las Casas (SCLC), in the Mexican state of Chiapas in southeastern Mexico. Our results provide a valuable tool for identifying these species in the region and shed light on their variability. A total of 125 specimens were collected, 78 R. norvegicus and 47 R. rattus, with sex ratios of 1Female:0.75Male and 1Female:0.51Male, respectively. Of the collected individuals, 47% of R. norvegicus and 44% of R. rattus were in the reproductive stage. Notably, 60% of R. norvegicus and 42% of R. rattus weighed < 100 g. Reproductive R. norvegicus averaged 131 g in body mass and 175.70 mm in body length. We found sexual dimorphism in R. norvegicus: males exhibited significantly larger ears (p = 0.044). Reproductive R. rattus specimens had an average body mass of 103.64 g and a body length of 166.21 mm. Cranial morphology differed substantially between species: R. norvegicus showed a robust skull with wider interorbital constriction and foramen magnum, whereas R. rattus showed a reduced rostral depth and a shorter mandibular ramus. SCLC R. norvegicus specimens were smaller by approximately 400 g (body mass) and 249.1 mm (mean length) than specimens from Baltimore, US (the largest recorded American population). Conversely, R. rattus specimens from SCLC (mean weight = 103.64 g; mean length = 166.21 mm) were larger than Yucatan populations (~70 g body mass).

Indexed as

Introduced SpeciesReproductionSkullAnimalsBody SizeFemaleMaleMexicoRatsSex CharacteristicsSex Ratioblack ratsbrown ratsmorphologysex ratioskullsomatic measurements

Identifiers

PMID42438275
PMCPMC13358315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.