ArticleAmerican journal of primatology2026
How Food Geometry and Toughness Influence Ingestive Patterns in Lemurs.
Article in American journal of primatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We investigate the extent to which food toughness, geometry, and/or lemur species determine biting locations during feeding. We quantified biting locations in two sympatric species, Lemur catta and Propithecus verreauxi, in Beza Mahafaly Special Reserve, Madagascar. Using video of seven lemur groups, we assigned biting locations to anterior, intermediate, or posterior positions. Food toughness (average and maximum) was measured using a portable field tester. Foods were categorized into four shape (flat, not-flat) and size (small, large) categories. Multinomial logistic regression models were used to test these predictors with food placement as the response. Toughness and food geometry significantly influenced biting positions, though not necessarily as predicted. P. verreauxi favored anterior placements for small, non-flat foods, whereas L. catta favored intermediate, and both used posterior with increasing food toughness. P. verreauxi has a robust masticatory system and can process "moderate" tough food anteriorly (initially defaulting to this position). However, they process food posteriorly as the food increases in toughness. L. catta more evenly distributes bites among the ingestion locations. These two lemur species differ in initial feeding behaviors that are likely related to underlying differences in masticatory morphology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.