SynthesisThe oncologist2026
Risk of venous thromboembolism with CDK4/6 inhibitor use in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in The oncologist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-negative, non-metastatic breast cancer represents a significant proportion of early-stage breast cancer. The introduction of cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors combined with endocrine therapy (ET) have significantly improved disease-free survival. Existing studies suggest that CDK4/6 inhibitors are associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). We further studied this risk. The databases Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Central) were searched. 4624 publications were screened for inclusion, and seven studies were selected for data extraction and analysis. Publications included studied patients who had a diagnosis of non-metastatic breast cancer and received treatment with CKD 4/6 inhibitors. Major exclusion criteria included age <18 years-old, metastatic cancer, and patients already diagnosed with a hypercoagulable disorder. The statistical analysis was performed using RevMan 9.19.0. We reported information in risk ratio (RR) and pooled the information with a random-effects meta-analysis according to the heterogeneity expected. We observed the incidence of VTE in the group of patients treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors to be larger (68/3165) than the incidence of VTE in patients treated with ET alone (11/2205). We found the relative risk of developing VTE was significantly higher with CDK4/6 inhibitor treatment than with treatment with ET alone (RR 3.8, 95% CI, 2.0-7.2). Overall, there was not a significant variability in effect estimates from the included studies (I2 = 0%). As the use of CDK4/6 grows, this information will help conversations about risks and benefits when selecting treatment plans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.