Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42438148›Full record

SynthesisThe oncologist2026

Risk of venous thromboembolism with CDK4/6 inhibitor use in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Elysa Cortez, Erick Torres Luna, Marcos Blancerte Ibarra, Imelda E Riojas Suárez, Herney A Garcia-Perdomo, Cristhiam M Rojas Hernandez

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The oncologist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elysa CortezThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX 77004, United States.ORCID 0009-0009-3649-419X
Erick Torres LunaInstituto Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey, NL 64700, Mexico.ORCID 0009-0007-0788-0089
Marcos Blancerte IbarraInstituto Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey, NL 64700, Mexico.ORCID 0009-0004-6793-290X
Imelda E Riojas SuárezUniversidad de Monterrey, Monterrey, NL 66238, Mexico.
Herney A Garcia-PerdomoUniversidad del Valle, Division of Urology/Urooncology, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Cali 760032, Colombia.
Cristhiam M Rojas HernandezUniversity of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Section of Hematology, Houston, TX 77030, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3890-3929

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-negative, non-metastatic breast cancer represents a significant proportion of early-stage breast cancer. The introduction of cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors combined with endocrine therapy (ET) have significantly improved disease-free survival. Existing studies suggest that CDK4/6 inhibitors are associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). We further studied this risk. The databases Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Central) were searched. 4624 publications were screened for inclusion, and seven studies were selected for data extraction and analysis. Publications included studied patients who had a diagnosis of non-metastatic breast cancer and received treatment with CKD 4/6 inhibitors. Major exclusion criteria included age <18 years-old, metastatic cancer, and patients already diagnosed with a hypercoagulable disorder. The statistical analysis was performed using RevMan 9.19.0. We reported information in risk ratio (RR) and pooled the information with a random-effects meta-analysis according to the heterogeneity expected. We observed the incidence of VTE in the group of patients treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors to be larger (68/3165) than the incidence of VTE in patients treated with ET alone (11/2205). We found the relative risk of developing VTE was significantly higher with CDK4/6 inhibitor treatment than with treatment with ET alone (RR 3.8, 95% CI, 2.0-7.2). Overall, there was not a significant variability in effect estimates from the included studies (I2 = 0%). As the use of CDK4/6 grows, this information will help conversations about risks and benefits when selecting treatment plans.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCyclin-Dependent Kinase 4Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6Protein Kinase InhibitorsVenous ThromboembolismFemaleHumansCDK4 protein, humanCDK6 protein, humanCyclin-Dependent Kinase 4Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6Protein Kinase Inhibitorsbreast cancercyclin-depended kinase 4/6 inhibitorsdeep vein thrombosishormone positivenon-metastaticpulmonary embolismvenous thromboembolism

Identifiers

PMID42438148
PMCPMC13375637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.