Observational studyJournal of viral hepatitis2026
Trends in Mortality After the Roll-Out of Directly Acting Antivirals for Hepatitis C in England Using Linked Surveillance Data.
Observational study in Journal of viral hepatitis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Directly acting antivirals (DAAs) revolutionised hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment, offering higher cure rates. We aimed to quantify life expectancy (LE) differences between treated and untreated individuals diagnosed with HCV and assess the contributions of age and causes of death to these differences. We used routine HCV surveillance data linked with UK mortality records. Individuals contributed person-time from age 15 or the earliest HCV diagnosis, whichever was later, and were classified as treated six months post-treatment initiation. The study was divided into two periods: 2015-2018 (Period 1), representing early DAA roll-out targeting advanced liver disease, and 2019-2022 (Period 2). We used non-parametric survival analysis methods and mortality decomposition methods to estimate LE differences, and age- and cause-specific contributions to LE differences. A total of 92,920 individuals contributed 322,570 untreated and 200,581 treated person-years of observation, and 13,294 deaths to the analyses. In Period 1, there was an 8.5-year LE advantage at age 15 for treated females (95% CI: 5.4-11.5) and 8.9 years for treated males (95% CI: 5.6-12.2). In Period 2, this declined to 6.7 (95% CI: 3.3-10.2) and 5.3 (95% CI: 3.0-7.6), respectively. The narrowing gap was driven by rising deaths from suicide, alcohol, and drug misuse in the treated population and corresponding declines in the untreated population. Treated individuals with HCV had consistently higher LE, though the advantage decreased over time. We hypothesise that the early prioritisation of individuals with cirrhosis resulted in a relatively healthier untreated population (i.e., fewer cirrhotic cases) in the later period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.