ArticlePhysiological reports2026
The effect of menstrual cycle timing on female elbow flexion force steadiness.
Article in Physiological reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study examined female elbow flexion force steadiness (n = 12) across menses, late follicular, and luteal phases of the menstrual cycle. To control for repeated testing effects unrelated to menstrual phase a male comparison group (n = 12) completed the same protocol over three equally spaced sessions as females. Maximal voluntary contractions (MVC) and force steadiness were assessed in neutral and pronated positions. Elbow flexion force tasks were performed at 2.5%, 5%, 10%, 25%, 50%, 75% MVC, and steadiness quantified as the coefficient of variation of force (CV force). Males were stronger than females (p < 0.001), and MVC did not differ between the self-reported menstrual cycle phases (p > 0.14) or between days in males (p > 0.56). CV of force did not differ across sessions for males (p < 0.36). However, in females, CV of force was greater during the luteal phase compared to menses (Neutral p = 0.02; Pronated p = 0.001); late follicular phase did not differ (Neutral p = 0.71; Pronated p = 0.10). During the luteal phase, females showed greater CV of force than males in the pronated position (p = 0.05). This study identifies reduced upper-limb force steadiness during the luteal phase (24.5
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.