Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42438108›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association2026

Mixed Response to Nivolumab Among Different Metastatic Sites in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Incidence and Clinical Implications.

Yudai Ishikawa, Hajime Tanaka, Yoshitomo Yamaguchi, Riko Maruyama, Shohei Fukuda, Yuma Waseda, Masaharu Inoue, Soichiro Yoshida, Yoh Matsuoka, Noboru Numao and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yudai IshikawaDepartment of Urology, Institute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7118-5522
Hajime TanakaDepartment of Urology, Institute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3632-2901
Yoshitomo YamaguchiDepartment of Urology, Institute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7075-0339
Riko MaruyamaDepartment of Urology, Institute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5793-7895
Shohei FukudaDepartment of Urology, Institute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuma WasedaDepartment of Urology, Institute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Masaharu InoueDepartment of Urology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Soichiro YoshidaDepartment of Urology, Institute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2757-8083
Yoh MatsuokaDepartment of Urology, Saitama Cancer Center, Saitama, Japan.
Noboru NumaoDepartment of Urology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Yasuhisa FujiiDepartment of Urology, Institute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDiscordant responses to immune checkpoint inhibition (ICIs) may occur at different sites in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). This study investigated the incidence and prognostic significance of mixed response in mRCC patients treated with nivolumab.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 116 mRCC patients who underwent nivolumab monotherapy without prior ICIs. The best overall response (BOR) was evaluated for each patient using RECIST version 1.1, and organ-specific responses were assessed for each metastatic site. Patients were classified into three groups: responders (lesion shrinkage in one or more metastatic organs without growth in any organ), non-responders (no lesion shrinkage in any organ), and mixed responders (co-existence of metastatic organ with shrinking lesions and those with growing lesions).

resultsThe median age was 68 years, and 74.1% of patients were male. The IMDC risk was favorable/intermediate/poor in 17/79/20 patients, respectively. BOR was CR/PR/SD/PD in 2/24/38/52 patients, respectively; objective response rate (ORR) was 22.4%. In organ-specific responses, ORR was lower for bone (7.1%), kidney (8.8%), and brain (0%) metastases than for other sites (17.4%-50.0%). The analysis classified 49 (42.2%), 15 (12.9%), and 52 (44.8%) patients as responders, mixed responders, and non-responders, respectively. During a median follow-up of 20.9 months, the median overall survival (OS) was 45.7 months. Two-year OS rate was 72.7% overall, and 92.2%, 90.0%, and 46.4% for responders, mixed responders, and non-responders, respectively (p < 0.001).

conclusionsNivolumab yielded diverse organ-specific responses, with 12.9% of patients exhibiting mixed response. Further studies are required to explore optimal management of mixed responders to immune checkpoint inhibition in mRCC.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalBone NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Renal CellImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsKidney NeoplasmsNivolumabAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesTreatment Effect HeterogeneityAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsNivolumabimmune checkpoint inhibitormetastatic renal cell carcinomamixed responsenivolumaborgan‐specific response

Identifiers

PMID42438108
PMCPMC13358008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.