Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42437969›Full record

ArticleThe New phytologist2026

NbRD21 protease controls receptor kinase homeostasis in Nicotiana benthamiana.

Alice Godson, Lauren Eddie, Mariana Schuster, Kaijie Zheng, Reka Toth, Yuge Li, Tianrun Li, Jie Huang, Farnusch Kaschani, Philippe V Jutras and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The New phytologist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Alice GodsonThe Plant Chemetics Laboratory, Department of Biology, University of Oxford, OX1 3EL, Oxford, UK.
Lauren EddieThe Plant Chemetics Laboratory, Department of Biology, University of Oxford, OX1 3EL, Oxford, UK.
Mariana SchusterThe Plant Chemetics Laboratory, Department of Biology, University of Oxford, OX1 3EL, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3836-0242
Kaijie ZhengThe Plant Chemetics Laboratory, Department of Biology, University of Oxford, OX1 3EL, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5773-5962
Reka TothDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, OX1 3EL, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4099-5359
Yuge LiThe Plant Chemetics Laboratory, Department of Biology, University of Oxford, OX1 3EL, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2388-7655
Tianrun LiThe Plant Chemetics Laboratory, Department of Biology, University of Oxford, OX1 3EL, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8589-4634
Jie HuangThe Plant Chemetics Laboratory, Department of Biology, University of Oxford, OX1 3EL, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6657-8740
Farnusch KaschaniAnalytics Core Facility Essen (ACE), Chemical Biology, Faculty of Biology, Universität Duisburg-Essen, ZMB, 45141, Essen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6572-3232
Philippe V JutrasThe Plant Chemetics Laboratory, Department of Biology, University of Oxford, OX1 3EL, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3310-4773
Jiorgos KourelisThe Plant Chemetics Laboratory, Department of Biology, University of Oxford, OX1 3EL, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9007-1333
Markus KaiserChemical Biology, Faculty of Biology, Universität Duisburg-Essen, ZMB, 45141, Essen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6540-8520
Tolga BozkurtDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, SW7 2AZ, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0507-6875
Renier A L Van der HoornThe Plant Chemetics Laboratory, Department of Biology, University of Oxford, OX1 3EL, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3692-7487

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/S003193/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/Y00969X/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council DDT00060FP7 Ideas: European Research Council 101019324Horizon 2020 Framework Programme 760331
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RD21-like proteases are papain-like cysteine proteases with a C-terminal granulin domain that are abundant and ubiquitous in angiosperms and have often been implicated in immunity. We previously found that the activity of RD21 in Nicotiana benthamiana (NbRD21) is suppressed during infection with Pseudomonas syringae. Here, we studied the role of NbRD21 in immunity and proteome processing. NbRD21 was disrupted by genome editing and rd21 mutants were subjected to disease assays and shotgun proteomics. Dipeptide substrate zLR-AMC was used in protease assays and agroinfiltration was used to transiently express NbRD21 and candidate substrates. Genome-edited lines lacking NbRD21 develop normally but have drastically reduced zLRase activity and are significantly more susceptible to P. syringae. Shotgun proteomics revealed an increased accumulation of c. 20 diverse receptor-like kinases (RLKs) in untreated rd21 knockout lines, but their transcript levels are unaltered when compared to wild-type plants. 35S-driven GFP-tagged RLKs accumulate more upon transient expression in rd21 plants than in wild-type plants. These data indicate that NbRD21 post-translationally controls RLK homeostasis, either by directly degrading RLKs or indirectly by regulating endocytic RLK recycling.

Indexed as

HomeostasisNicotianaPlant ProteinsProtein KinasesGene Expression Regulation, PlantMutationPlant DiseasesProteomicsPseudomonas syringaePlant ProteinsProtein KinasesimmunityproteolysisPseudomonas syringaereceptor homeostasisreceptor kinase

Identifiers

PMID42437969
PMCPMC13443273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.