ArticleJournal of health, population, and nutrition2026
Predicting and identifying determinants of stunting among school-aged children in Ethiopia: a machine learning approach.
Article in Journal of health, population, and nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChildhood stunting remains a major public health concern, reflecting chronic undernutrition and long-term socioeconomic disadvantage. Among school-aged children, stunting is associated with impaired physical growth, reduced cognitive development, and poorer educational outcomes. Traditional statistical approaches, such as logistic regression, have been widely used to examine factors associated with stunting; however, their ability to capture complex and nonlinear relationships is limited. Machine learning (ML) methods provide a flexible alternative for modeling such relationships.
objectiveThis study aimed to model and classify stunting among school-aged children in Ethiopia using school- and household-level data, and to compare the performance of machine learning algorithms with multivariable logistic regression.
methodsA cross-sectional analysis was conducted using secondary data from Round 5 (2016-2017) of the Young Lives study in Ethiopia. Stunting was defined as a binary outcome based on World Health Organization height-for-age Z-score criteria. Several machine learning algorithms, including Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, and Gradient Boosting Machine, were implemented. Model performance was evaluated using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Variable importance measures were used to identify predictors contributing to model performance. To avoid potential circularity, anthropometric variables closely related to the outcome (e.g., child weight) were excluded from the final models.
resultsThe Random Forest model demonstrated modestly improved performance compared with logistic regression and other machine learning methods, and its performance was evaluated using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, AUC, and F1-score. Key predictors included school type, household wealth index, literacy-related indicators, and region of residence. Notable regional variation in stunting classification was observed, suggesting the influence of broader socioeconomic and environmental conditions.
conclusionMachine learning models, particularly Random Forest, showed slightly better performance than conventional logistic regression in classifying stunting among school-aged children in Ethiopia. The identified predictors highlight the multifactorial and context-dependent nature of stunting. These findings support the use of ML approaches as complementary analytical tools for understanding patterns of child undernutrition, although their application for prediction should be interpreted within the limitations of cross-sectional data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.