ArticleCardiovascular diabetology2026
Cardiovascular outcomes of empagliflozin-GLP-1RA combination therapy in type 2 diabetes: EMPRISE study.
Article in Cardiovascular diabetology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEvidence on the cardiovascular benefits of combining empagliflozin with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) is limited, derived primarily from indirect comparisons or subgroup analyses of cardiovascular outcome trials.
methodsWe conducted a cohort study emulating two comparative effectiveness trials using US healthcare databases (2013-2022), including federal Medicare and commercial claims data (Optum Clinformatics and MarketScan). Among adults with type 2 diabetes in routine care, we compared cardiovascular outcomes in patients initiating: (i) empagliflozin first, followed by augmentation with either GLP-1RA or dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i), and (ii) GLP-1RA first, followed by augmentation with either empagliflozin or sulfonylureas. Primary outcomes were modified major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE; composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, and all-cause mortality) and a composite of hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) or all-cause mortality. We estimated hazard ratios (HR) and rate differences (RD) per 1,000 person-years with 95% confidence intervals (CI), adjusting for over 130 baseline covariates using propensity score matching weights.
resultsCompared with empagliflozin-DPP-4i initiators, empagliflozin-GLP-1RA was associated with lower risk of MACE [HR: 0.81 (95% CI: 0.67, 0.97); RD: -3.7 (-7.1, -0.2)] and lower HHF-mortality [HR: 0.61 (0.48, 0.77); RD: -6.6 (-9.3, -3.9)]. Compared with the GLP-1RA-sulfonylurea combination, the GLP-1RA-empagliflozin combination had lower risks of MACE [HR: 0.68 (0.56, 0.81); RD: -5.3 (-7.9, -2.6)] and HHF-mortality [HR: 0.62 (0.51, 0.76); RD: -3.7 (-6.1, -1.8)].
conclusionsIn US clinical practice, adding GLP-1RA to empagliflozin was associated with lower risks of MACE and HHF-mortality compared with adding DPP-4i. Among GLP-1RA initiators, adding empagliflozin was associated with lower cardiovascular risk than adding sulfonylureas, supporting potential additive cardiovascular benefits of GLP-1RA-empagliflozin combination therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.