ArticleBMC public health2026
Exploring specific-situational factors of risky sexual behaviors among Chinese college students: a mixed methods study.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRisky sexual behavior refers to sexual activity that increases the likelihood of STIs, unintended pregnancies, and negative psychosocial outcomes. College students are susceptible to such behaviors. This study aimed to identify proximal situational factors contributing to risky sexual behaviors among Chinese college students and to integrate these with individual-level psychosocial correlates using a sequential explanatory mixed-methods design.
methodsIn phase 1 (cross-sectional, September-December 2022), college students from three universities in Daqing, Northeast China, completed an online questionnaire assessing attitudes toward sexuality, perceived social support, protection self-efficacy, sexual assertiveness, and sexual limit-setting self-efficacy. Univariate and binary logistic regression analyses identified factors associated with risky sexual behaviors. In phase 2 (March-July 2023), purposeful sampling selected students who had engaged in risky sexual behaviors for semi-structured interviews. Data were analyzed using NVivo 11.0.
resultsAmong 1,761 participants, 25.72% reported sexual activity and 9.60% reported risky sexual behavior; among sexually active students, the prevalence was 37.3%. Specific-situational factors included material environment (economic status, resource accessibility), social environment (partner characteristics, peer influence, entertainment venues), antecedent states (attitudes toward premarital sex, sexual desire/impulse, negative emotions), objective elements (psychological needs, sexual mental health, social media for dating), and opportunity elements (relationship status, solitude).
conclusionsThis study integrates individual-level psychosocial correlates with proximal situational factors to understand risky sexual behaviors among college students. The findings extend individual-level explanations by identifying material, social, emotional, motivational, and opportunity-related contexts that immediately precede risky behaviors, providing evidence for situational risk screening and targeted prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.