Trial reportBMC pediatrics2026
An intervention for fear of progression in childhood cancer patients and their parents: feasibility and preliminary efficacy in a pilot randomised controlled trial.
Trial report in BMC pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFear of progression (FoP) is a significant psychosocial burden for children with cancer and their parents, influencing their quality of life (HRQoL) and emotional adjustment. In this pilot randomised controlled trial (RCT) we present results on feasibility and preliminary efficacy of the family-based therapeutic intervention "Kinder-Progredienzangst" (KIPA), targeting FoP in pediatric oncology.
methodsN = 29 families with a child undergoing acute cancer treatment or follow-up care completed the program, with participation open to parents alone or to parents and children; ultimately, n = 6 children participated. Eligibility criteria included moderate or high FoP in at least one family member. Families were randomised to either an intervention group or a waitlist-control group receiving treatment as usual. KIPA consists of psychoeducation, anxiety confrontation, and resource activation. Participants completed questionnaires for FoP, anxiety, depression, HRQoL, and posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) at different time points. Participation and retention rates were calculated, and we used Mann-Whitney U tests for between-group comparisons, Friedman and Wilcoxon tests for within-group comparisons and Hedges g for effect sizes.
resultsFeasibility results showed a participation rate of 23%, with higher participation in acute treatment (51%) compared to follow-up care (15%). Retention rates were 71% overall, with significant variability between settings. Efficacy analyses revealed significant differences in parental FoP between study conditions with high effect size (W = 65.5, p=.023, g=-0.855). Improvements were also noted in PTSS (W = 33, p<.001, g=-1.365), anxiety (W = 59, p=.017, g=-0.906) and mental (W = 217, p<.001, g = 1.619) and physical (W = 180, p=.042, g = 0.834) HRQoL. The pre-post analysis showed a significant reduction in parental FoP in both settings, and the follow-up data indicates sustainability. Effects on children's FoP were not significant.
conclusionThe study showed mixed feasibility-particularly regarding child participation, follow-up enrolment and drop-out during acute treatment-highlighting the need for optimisation before larger trials. Nevertheless, the data provide initial indications that KIPA may benefit parents of children with cancer across both acute and follow-up care settings, a group highly affected by FoP. Given the methodological limitations, the efficacy results should be viewed as preliminary. To demonstrate KIPA's effectiveness, especially in children, large multicentre trials using reliable RCT designs suitable for acute care settings are needed.
trial registrationThe trial was retrospectively registered at the German Trial Registry (TRN: DRKS00024106, 04.05.2022).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.