ArticleBMC geriatrics2026
Evaluating and simulating long-term care menus to meet nutrient- and food-based standards.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMost provinces require long-term care (LTC) home menus to meet nutrient requirements and align with Canada's food guide (CFG-2019). However, compliance remains challenging for dietitians and food service staff due to limited tools and guidance to support implementation in practice. This study evaluated current and simulated LTC menus against nutrient- and food-based standards to identify the characteristics of menus meeting both requirements.
methodsA database of 1,365 menu items from a four-week LTC menu cycle provided by a major North American foodservice company was used to simulate 10,000 one-day LTC menus. Compliance with LTC-specific nutrient targets and alignment with CFG-2019 were assessed. Menus meeting both standards were further evaluated using the Canadian Food Scoring System (CFSS) and Healthy Eating Food Index (HEFI)-2019.
resultsCurrent LTC menus (n = 28) met most macronutrient and 10 micronutrient targets, with a mean HEFI-2019 score of 45.3/80 (57%), below the desired 75% compliance threshold. Of the 10,000 simulated menus, 28 met all nutrient-based targets and six met both nutrient- and food-based standards. These compliant menus provided an average of 2,857 kcal, 107 g protein, 32 g fibre, and a mean HEFI-2019 score of 61.7/80 (77%). On average, 58% of menu items were classified as "Good & Excellent" according to the CFSS, with approximately 10 serving equivalents of fruits and vegetables, 2.5 of whole grains, and 5 of protein foods.
conclusionAlthough provincial regulations require LTC menus to comply with both nutrient- and food-based standards, full compliance was not achieved using foods available from a single large provider. Nutrient-compliant menus were characterized by higher energy provision and greater nutrient density, underscoring the need for more healthy options and practical supports, including LTC-specific planning tools, food guide serving benchmarks, and accessible resources to facilitate routine menu planning and regulatory compliance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.