Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42437667›Full record

ArticleBone & joint open2026

Validation of a standardized question and a numerical rating scale for assessment of patient satisfaction after knee arthroplasty at one and two years.

Nick D Clement, Donia Karimaghaei, Irrum Afzal, Fares S Haddad, Deiary F Kader

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bone & joint open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nick D ClementSouth West London Elective Orthopaedic Centre, Epsom, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8792-0659
Donia KarimaghaeiSouth West London Elective Orthopaedic Centre, Epsom, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9568-8810
Irrum AfzalSouth West London Elective Orthopaedic Centre, Epsom, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0199-8725
Fares S HaddadConsultant Orthopaedic SurgeonDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Princess Grace Hospital, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6272-0156
Deiary F KaderSouth West London Elective Orthopaedic Centre, Epsom, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8332-2296

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: The aim was to validate the use of a standardized satisfaction question with a numerical rating scale (NRS) response following knee arthroplasty (KA) at one and two years. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted over six years and included 7,644 KAs in 6,690 patients. Patient demographic details, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, and preoperative and postoperative Oxford Knee Scores (OKS), and EQ-5D-3L) scores were obtained from a local arthroplasty register. Patient satisfaction was assessed at one and two years postoperatively using a standardized questionnaire with possible responses ranging from 0 (not satisfied) to 100 (very satisfied) on a NRS. Results: During the study period, 5,893 and 4,879 KA had completed outcomes at one and two years' follow-up, respectively. The median satisfaction score was 90 (IQR 80 to 100). There were moderate correlations between the postoperative OKS at one year ( Conclusion: The NRS was a valid, reliable, and universally applicable measure of satisfaction following KA, with a smaller ceiling effect than Likert scales. One year appears optimal for assessing satisfaction, as no further improvement occured beyond this, and follow-up rates decline. The defined thresholds will help identify satisfied and unsatisfied patients.

Identifiers

PMID42437667
PMCPMC13356975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.