ArticleBone & joint open2026
Validation of a standardized question and a numerical rating scale for assessment of patient satisfaction after knee arthroplasty at one and two years.
Article in Bone & joint open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: The aim was to validate the use of a standardized satisfaction question with a numerical rating scale (NRS) response following knee arthroplasty (KA) at one and two years. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted over six years and included 7,644 KAs in 6,690 patients. Patient demographic details, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, and preoperative and postoperative Oxford Knee Scores (OKS), and EQ-5D-3L) scores were obtained from a local arthroplasty register. Patient satisfaction was assessed at one and two years postoperatively using a standardized questionnaire with possible responses ranging from 0 (not satisfied) to 100 (very satisfied) on a NRS. Results: During the study period, 5,893 and 4,879 KA had completed outcomes at one and two years' follow-up, respectively. The median satisfaction score was 90 (IQR 80 to 100). There were moderate correlations between the postoperative OKS at one year ( Conclusion: The NRS was a valid, reliable, and universally applicable measure of satisfaction following KA, with a smaller ceiling effect than Likert scales. One year appears optimal for assessing satisfaction, as no further improvement occured beyond this, and follow-up rates decline. The defined thresholds will help identify satisfied and unsatisfied patients.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.