ReviewBriefings in bioinformatics2026
Topological deep learning for drug-target interaction, virtual screening, and docking scoring: a practical, benchmark-driven review.
Review in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Artificial intelligence is now central to computational drug discovery, yet performance in core tasks-drug-target interaction (DTI) prediction, virtual screening (VS), and docking scoring-is still limited by the multiscale geometric nature of molecular recognition and by evaluation pitfalls such as dataset bias and leakage. Topological deep learning (TDL) offers a complementary route to encode global and multiscale structure from ligands, binding pockets, surfaces, and protein-ligand complexes via persistent homology and related constructions. This review provides a practical, task-driven synthesis of TDL methods for DTI/VS/docking scoring, with an emphasis on design choices that determine real-world utility: (i) data modality (ligand, pocket, or complex/pose) under controllable uncertainty, (ii) topological objects and filtration families (distance/alpha versus physicochemical or interaction-field filtrations), and (iii) vectorizations and integration patterns (persistent homology-as-features, hybrid geometric deep learning, and emerging end-to-end approaches). Distinct from prior surveys, we present a decision-oriented taxonomy and a benchmark-driven evaluation playbook that specifies minimum standards for splits (scaffold, temporal, and target-wise/cluster), metrics (including early-recognition metrics for VS), baselines, and ablations to isolate the topological contribution. To support reproducibility, we provide a reporting checklist and curated summary tables (methods matrix and benchmark recommendations) that map tasks to recommended protocols and common failure modes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.