ArticleExperimental brain research2026
Exploring unintentional drifts in finger force production and muscle activity: a study of finger independence.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Unintentional changes in finger force during sustained exertions, known as force drifts, are thought to reflect limits in neural control of independent finger movements. Prior work has examined drifts at the level of finger force, but less is known about how these changes are reflected in muscle activity. Our study sought to quantify the phenomenon of unintentional finger force drifts in digits 2-5, performing both single-finger flexion and extension. Twenty right-handed participants (10 females, 10 males; ages 18-29) performed 30 s isometric flexion and extension exertions with digits 2-5 at 15% and 30% of their maximum voluntary contraction (MVC). Visual feedback was either continuous or removed after 10 s. Finger forces and surface EMG from flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) and extensor digitorum communis (EDC) were recorded. Removing visual feedback produced consistent downward drifts of instructed finger force in 15% MVC and 30% MVC flexion (0.6-8.4% MVC) and 30% MVC extension (1.4-5.2% MVC). With continuous feedback, the uninstructed fingers showed small upward force drifts (0.5-3.9% MVC), which were largely abolished when feedback was removed. Changes in instructed finger force were accompanied by modest decreases in EMG, whereas upward uninstructed drifts were associated with small increases in EMG; however, these changes were distributed across compartments and not specific to individual fingers. Extension tasks revealed similar patterns to flexion tasks but only at higher force levels, suggesting that both force magnitude and direction shape the conditions under which force drifts emerge. These findings provide evidence that finger force drifts reflect real-time changes to neural constraints on finger independence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42437433What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.